Peer Review

This is a demonstration environment developed by GreyMind Press. It is not an active scholarly journal and does not accept real submissions.

On this page

Review model
Independent expert evaluation
Reviewer confidentiality
Editorial independence
Conflict of interest

Peer review is central to the editorial standards GreyMind Journal is designed around. The following principles describe the intended review process and are presented for demonstration purposes.

Review model

GreyMind Journal uses a double-anonymous peer review model in which author and reviewer identities are concealed from one another.

Independent expert evaluation

Submissions are evaluated by independent experts selected for their relevant subject knowledge.

Reviewer confidentiality

Reviewer identities and reports are treated as confidential and are not disclosed to authors.

Editorial independence

Editorial decisions are made independently of authors, funders and institutional interests.

Conflict of interest

Reviewers are asked to declare conflicts of interest before accepting an assignment.