ACSS Submitted
AuthorThe author submits a manuscript for scholarly screening with basic metadata (title and abstract).
GREYMIND · ACSS · PROCESS
ACSS moves a manuscript through a defined, auditable screening sequence. Each stage has a clear actor and a clear meaning — and none of them substitutes for peer review or editorial acceptance.
Progress flows from submission through screening, author response and revision, to completion, final authorship confirmation and journal-screening eligibility.
The author submits a manuscript for scholarly screening with basic metadata (title and abstract).
The ACSS Coordinator performs a light administrative and eligibility check — completeness and fit — not a scholarly judgement.
The ACSS Coordinator assigns one or more ACSS Screeners to the manuscript.
Assigned screeners review the manuscript for scholarly soundness, structure and readiness. This is screening, not peer review.
All assigned screeners have submitted their screening reports for the current revision.
The author is asked to respond to screening feedback and, where needed, revise the manuscript.
The author submits a revised manuscript and response to the screening feedback.
Where required, the revised manuscript is re-screened before the screening conclusion is finalised.
Screening concludes. ACSS Complete is a screening milestone only — it is not acceptance and not peer review.
The author confirms final authorship. This author-side gate must complete before journal-screening eligibility.
The manuscript is eligible to proceed into the normal journal screening and editorial workflow.
Eligibility for journal screening is the end of ACSS — and the beginning of the normal journal workflow.
Ready to prepare a manuscript? Start with the free manuscript tools, or review what ACSS is before you begin.
Explore Simple Tools